Agenda and minutes

MCA - Local Enterprise Partnership - Thursday, 14th January, 2021 11.00 am

Venue: 11 Broad Street West, Sheffield S1 2BQ

Items
No. Item

1.

Welcome and Apologies

Minutes:

The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. 

 

Apologies for absence were noted as above.

2.

Declarations of Interest

·         In relation to any agenda item

·         In relation to any activity since the last formal meeting

·         In relation to any forthcoming activity

Minutes:

Mayor Jones declared an interest in agenda item 4 – South Yorkshire Freeport Bid.

3.

Notes of Last Meeting pdf icon PDF 280 KB

Minutes:

The notes of the previous meeting were agreed to be an accurate record.

4.

South Yorkshire Freeport Bid pdf icon PDF 177 KB

Minutes:

A paper was submitted which presented the background information regarding the Government’s Freeport Policy together with an update on the work underway to prepare a formal submission, including setting out the key issues relating to the submission and its links with the Strategic Economic Plan.

 

M Lynam and T Lees provided Members with a presentation on the latest update position.  Members noted the following points:-

 

·            The Government had set out three policy objectives for Freeports, which had been primarily developed by the Treasury. 

·            A total of 3,500 Freeports were located around the World and had existed in many locations for over 40 years.  The UK model was a bespoke and unique approach, which had not been replicated in other countries. 

·            The priorities set out by the Government related to creating hubs for global trading and investment, regeneration, job creation and levelling up in order to create higher paid and higher skilled jobs, to promote the innovation and trialling of new technologies, initiatives and ideas around the sites. 

·            Tax sites and Customs sites would need to be identified within the UK model.

·            Freeports required a site which was a port that could receive international goods and should consist of both Customs and Tax sites.

·            Tax sites required under developed land which could be aligned with the bidding area’s focus. 

·            Customs sites were required to have demonstratable import/export activity. 

·            A stringent authorisation process would be undertaken by the sites, which was the equivalent to the Approved Economic Operator.

 

The Government had published a bidding prospectus on 16 November 2020, for the establishment of up to 10 Freeports in the UK, with one in each of the four nations.  This was a competitive process, to which approximately 30 locations had expressed an interest.  The deadline for bid submissions to MHCLG was 5 February 2021, and a decision would be made by the Ministers in the Spring 2021.  Successful bids would be required to prepare an Outline Business Case during the Summer 2021.  Work was underway to reach a final bid submission.

 

The South Yorkshire Freeport bid had been formed around the IPort and Doncaster Sheffield Airport which were both closely based together in Doncaster.  Far reaching engagement had been made with partners.  The Chambers had provided assistance in arranging online sessions with over 45 South Yorkshire based businesses regarding the potential opportunities offered by the Freeport bid and to identify those businesses which wished to become Customs sites.

 

J Muir suggested that it would be helpful to discuss the economic implications for Tax and Customs sites outside of the meeting, in order to acquire an understanding to be shared with colleagues.  ACTION:-  J Muir

 

The MCA Investment Team continued to focus outside of the SCR, with a view to bringing investment into the area.  As part of the implementation plan for the successful bids, there was an expectation to set out how the investment would be attracted.  A requirement within the Freeport Policy related to how the retained business rates were used on  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.

5.

Strategic Economic Plan - Final pdf icon PDF 129 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

A paper was submitted which presented the final Strategic Economic Plan (SEP).

 

At the last Board meeting held in November 2020, public consultation comments had been presented which indicated broadly supportive feedback to the SEP.  Following the SEP consultation and the feedback that had been received at that meeting, the final changes had been made to the SEP.

 

J Muir expressed his thanks and appreciation, on behalf of the Board, to everyone involved in the huge undertaking in the preparation of the SEP.

 

RESOLVED – That Members noted the work done to date, changes made and formally adopted the Strategic Economic Plan.

6.

Implications of the Spending Review for the LEP pdf icon PDF 169 KB

Minutes:

A paper was presented which summarised the announcements within the Government’s Spending Review as it related to the agenda of the Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP).  Members were requested to consider the potential implications.

 

The Chancellor had delivered the Spending Review on 25 November 2020, which due to the unprecedented impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on public finances, had become a single year focus that had included a number of longer-term infrastructure commitments.  The comprehensive review would now take place in 2021.

 

The Board considered the following issues in progressing its priorities:-

 

Working to secure the funds to unlock its business investment pipeline. 

Being ‘bid’ ready. 

Making the case for further devolution. 

Delivery was key.

J Muir commented that the follow-up to the Local Government funding had been a topic which had been in existence well into the previous Government’s regime of Theresa May MP.  Discussions with members of the Civil Service of Ministry for Local Government had admitted that the objectives at the beginning of 2020 had been very different to those at the end of 2020, which had not been as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.  It would be necessary to ascertain a level of clarity in terms of the Government’s policy for business growth.

 

It was noted that the largest potential implication would be that funding would not be available to support certain types of activity principally whilst seeking to secure business deals for direct foreign investment or indigenous business growth, where the MCA was seeking to facilitate that growth.  The MCA constantly evaluated the strategy to engage with the Government in such discussions, and strong points continued to be made both privately and publicly.  Mayor Jarvis MBE in conjunction with Members of the MCA, had pressed the points at a Ministerial level.

 

J Muir stated that he was keen to raise the issue with Clive Betts MP, who was a Member of the Select Committee that oversaw the Local Government Ministry.  The aim was to continue to work with the Treasury to discuss and highlight the areas to be addressed.  He considered that if the MCA utilised the available resources, then it would be possible to demonstrate activities in order to create both new quality and skilled jobs.

 

RESOLVED – That Members considered the issues arising from the Spending Review as they related to the LEP and as set out in paragraph 2.4 of the report.

7.

Businesses Pipeline Development and Selection pdf icon PDF 193 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

A paper was presented to provide Members with an update on the significant investment opportunities that had been identified from LEP led business engagement.  The report recommended a selection of 13 identified schemes onto the pipeline in order that Business Cases may be developed.

 

A total of £46.8m had been invested by the LEP in business support since 2014, which had been primarily through the LGF.  The position as at Quarter 4 2019/20 had indicated that the funding had achieved 2,827 direct jobs that had been created or safeguarded, at a cost per job of £16,554.65, together with private sector leverage of £92.1m.  The relative position had not materially improved, and the region continued to underperform on a number of indicators.  The development of the new economic plan and the COVID-19 pandemic had identified a number of factors.

 

A collective partnership had been formed between the LEP, Mayor Jarvis MBE and the MCA, who had produced a recovery plan which was currently being implemented in stages.  One element of the recovery plan related to how businesses could be promoted and sustained during the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequences of Brexit.  This included supporting sustained businesses which were in distress and would have been sustainable in normal circumstances.  A great deal of work and investment was currently underway which was partly funded by the gain share allocation and the Government grant.  The second element of the strategy related to the promotion of new opportunities, to develop and support businesses that were thriving and growing despite the pandemic, or as a consequence of the pandemic to provide access to new jobs and opportunities to the communities of South Yorkshire. 

 

Dr Smith expressed his thanks to J Muir, Mayor Jones CBE and

N MacDonald for the substantial amount of steer and support provided regarding promoting new opportunities.  Progress continued to be provided to each of the business board meetings.

 

J Muir referred to a recent discussion between Mayor Jones CBE,

N MacDonald, R Barker and himself regarding presenting more granularity on the projects to the Business Growth Board’s cohort of Chairs.

 

RESOLVED – That the LEP Board Members:-

 

1.      Noted the update on the development of the business pipeline.

 

2.    Accepted the schemes detailed in Section 2.6 and Appendix A of the report to the programme pipeline, noting that projects would only be supported if future funding was received and assurance requirements were met.

8.

Assurance, Monitoring and Evaluation Framework Update pdf icon PDF 150 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

A paper was presented which provided Members with the details on the policy updates that were required to conclude prior to the end of the financial year; namely the Assurance Framework, the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and the review of LEP Board Policies.  The report also highlighted any known issues that were to be addressed and provided an indicative timeline, highlighting when further detailed information would be presented for consideration.

 

NB. AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, THE BOARD WAS NO LONGER QUORATE.

 

RESOLVED – That the LEP Board Members:-

 

1.      Considered the documents and policies to be updated and the indicative timeline for progression to the MCA Boards and on to National Government.

 

2.     Agreed that Neil McDonald, as Chair of the Assurance Panel, provided input, on behalf of the Private Sector Board Members, to the review of the Assurance Framework.

 

3.    LEP Members agreed to consider and feedback any comments on the draft Monitoring and Evaluation Framework, particularly how information and intelligence collated was shared with Thematic and the LEP Boards to inform their role and future decision making.

9.

Mayoral Update pdf icon PDF 216 KB

Minutes:

A paper was presented to provide the LEP Board Members with an update on the key Mayoral activity relating to the economic agenda.

 

Updates were provided on:-

 

·           The COVID-19 pandemic.

·           The Brexit Deal.

·           Driving a stronger, greener and fairer South Yorkshire through our renewal effort.

 

RESOLVED – That the LEP Board Members noted the updates.

10.

Chief Executive's Update pdf icon PDF 214 KB

Minutes:

A paper was presented to provide the LEP Board Members with a general update on the activity being undertaken by the LEP outside of the agenda items under discussion.

 

Updates were provided on:-

 

·           AEB Procurement.

·           Quarterly Economic Review.

·           COVID-19 Business Input Group.

·           Skills Advisory Network.

·           Future High Streets Fund.

·           Annual Performance Review.

 

RESOLVED – That the LEP Board Members noted the updates.